Suspension polymerisation fundamentals

Core process physics evidence supporting one defined part of the DISE engineering architecture.

CITE THEM RIGHT HARVARD

Brooks, B.W. (2010) ‘Suspension Polymerization Processes’, Chemical Engineering & Technology, 33(11), pp. 1737–1744. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000210.

WHAT THE PAPER ESTABLISHES

The evidence contribution

Explains industrial free-radical suspension polymerisation, including the relationship between polymerising droplet size and final bead size, and the roles of breakage, coalescence, suspending agents and flow regime.

WHY IT MATTERS TO DISE

This paper underpins the heart of DISE: each monomer droplet is intended to act as a microreactor and bead template. It directly informs mixing, droplet-size control, stabiliser selection and scale-up risk.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this reference does not prove

The article addresses conventional reactors, not a flowing HPHT fracture environment. DISE adds thermal history, pressure, brine chemistry, shear and delayed initiation constraints.

LABORATORY TRANSLATION

How it shapes the DISE programme

Record D10, D50 and D90 before and after thermal exposure.

Test breakage and coalescence across the intended shear window.

Check continuous-phase monomer or initiator leakage to exclude bulk polymerisation.

Open publisher / DOI record Return to Laboratory Programme

Evidence classification: literature precedent. This page explains relevance to DISE; it does not represent experimental validation of the integrated platform.